Dear Reviewer

Dear Reviewer,


once you start reviewing en.light.en.ment, you'll soon know just how personal my book is. Please allow me to make a few comments.


Due to the nature of my writings, my essays are developed on an ongoing basis; I read, correct & update my book - and my blog - daily. In my impressum I say for good reason:  

“I work on them day & night, in fact, all but every minute of every day & every night.”


Thus my book is revised frequently. A   revision   may reflect a current affair  …  like in the essay  GUNS, which had the 2017 Las Vegas shooting incorporated in edition 34. Some essays have references to popular sciences, i.e.  FUNDAMENTAL ISSUE, which are updated regularly too.

Edition 38 has a new essay added:   INTIMACY  which deals with the Weinstein-Spacey-Trump scandal.

And when I read a book "The Happiness Advantage" I promptly added a relevant paragraph at the bottom of my essay  HAPPINESS,  updated in edition 36.

One outstanding characteristic of my book - I think - is its close link to my blogs. On many pages and with numerous subject matters I will link to a blog and then elaborate, sometimes extensively; see my blog  869.


You probably will agree that I have created a devilish problem for myself when I decided - for good or for bad - on that unusual format for my essays and the layout of my book.


Every page is hand-made in MS Word ... no two pages are the same in layout and I refer to my at times somewhat odd language as German/Australian/English.


While this language and book-format are an expression of myself - the way I function, the way I am (in my life-long working career I was a still life photographer, each  photo  is hand-made) - it does not so much restrict me ... as force me to discipline* myself.

As regards my frequent revisions, here is another reason: Since I limit myself to a single page with each essay and especially since I design my pages with my words surrounded by much white space, I confine myself to brevity ... this often calls for repeated revisions.


I am particularly in tune with these traits of Bertrand Russell's:  (from my essay  RUSSELL)

My paragraphs and sentences are constructed painstakingly, words are chosen carefully and since English is my second language, I use the dictionary & thesaurus extensively.

However, one aspect of the odd layout & language is that editors find it hard to work with my text, hence I am my own editor …


"This is such an interesting & idiosyncratic book that I'm not sure it should be edited (really, proofread) at all, you write very well and it'd be a shame to lose any of your natural voice."


... helped by my readers, who may point to obvious mistakes - maybe spelling or factual mistakes - but also conceptual inconsistencies.

I deem my book en.light.en.ment - as unusual as it is - a living thing, with heart and soul, and it always and forever will be a work in progress ... still from my impressum: 

“The book is not finished - it never will be, “an essay (a poem) is never finished, only abandoned” (Paul Valéry); “has anybody ever finished anything?” (Leonardo da Vinci).”

Furthermore, due to my book's format, where the pages are fixed PDFs, I cannot publish it as an e-pub, which in turns means my book is not available on the major e-book channels. In fact, I prefer to sell it from my website.

I say "prefer". It soon will be available also from Amazon & major retailers, but the retail-volume will only be updated once a year, i.e. this year's retail book is volume 2018, edition 38 (next year's will be volume 2019, probably edition 46) ... whereas the edition available here on my website is constantly updated.

Anyway, this is the reasons why I advise my readers to use the paperback: Since my essays stand on their own, you don't need to read my book from cover to cover ... you can read pages randomly; open the book arbitrarily; see what you find; be surprised.

You, dear reviewer, right now are my new best friend, of course ... the most important person in my life. But make no bones about it, I haven't written en.light.en.ment for you, nor for my readers (as much as I cherish them); no, in the first place I write it for myself ... to see my thoughts and feelings on a white page with black & grey ink, to clear my head.

The 2nd reason why I write is to help make the world a better place, as per Krishnamurti. He believed the world needs a revolution; I second that notion. See my essay  KRISHNAMURTI

Thank you.



"Shined shoes save lives." So said General Norm Schwarzkopf ... 

"in the heat of battle, under pressure, the undisciplined die." 


I reckon so it is in the indie-book trade. 

Was my work not disciplined, my book would die ... as would I.